PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND:  when i read this in today's wall street journal, i almost died. does not this prove that this administration has chosen to appease musharaf and the taliban, and instead had an OPTIONAL WAR IN IRAQ. i think we should explain it this way. the true 9.11.01 perps are known to be in these lands and our administration has appeased the leader of the country that protects them. how do we get this to be explained to the country that does not read the wall street journal. please help. any and all input would be appreciated. in memory of our fallen brothers and sisters on 9.11.01. never forget, and never appease.  
 PLEASE SEE THE WSJ OP/ED PIECE BELOW

the dems should underscore the hoover like job loss with the fact that the standard and poors 500 was at about 1400 when bush was elected in nov. 2000 and is down 20% to 1122. bush even hurts that all sacred investor class.